H & R Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSabers, Justice
I dissent.
The trial court held that:
The Plaintiff’s Lien is invalid and thus its Complaint insofar as it seeks a foreclosure must be denied. However, it will stand to the extent that the Complaint demands Judgment against Defendants, Clair F. Wieseler, AJH, Inc., and Alex Group.
*154If it is valid for judgment purposes, why isn’t it valid for mechanic’s lien purposes?
In Ringgenberg v. Wilmsmeyer, 253 N.W.2d 197 (S.D.1977), this court held that: “ ‘Where the work is contracted for as an entirety for a specific amount, ... all the information is given that is needed or can reasonably be required.’ ”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mississippi Woodworking Company v. MaherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Wadsworth Homes, Inc. v. Woodridge CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Ringgenberg v. WilmsmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Taylor v. NetherwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Mebane Lumber Co. v. Avery & Bullock Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.