Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Baltimore & O. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided December 17, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

At Lav. Charge to the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Sage, J.,

(orally.) This action is to recover damages against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company for injuries received on the 1st of August, 1888, at Locust Grove crossing, about four and one-half miles south of Newark, by the collision of a train with the horse and buggy in which the plaintiff was then riding with her mother, who was driving. The accident occurred about 12 o’clock at noon of that day. The testimony of the mother is that, between 10 and 11 o’clock, she started with her daughter from their home, 12 miles from Newark, intending to go to that city. They were in a phaeton…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. MaresSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Quebec Steamship Co. v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Stitt v. HuidekopersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. Lawrence v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Carter v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Fechley v. Springfield Traction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Miami Cycle & Mfg. Co. v. National Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API