Legal Opinion
Pressteel Company v. Halo Lighting Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1963No. 17716PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
314 F.2d 695
PRESSTEEL COMPANY, a copartnership composed of Preston A. Jones and Wallace D. Runswick and Marvin Electric Manufacturing Company, Appellants,
v.
HALO LIGHTING PRODUCTS, INC., and Halo Lighting of California, Inc., Appellees.
No. 17716.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 1963.
Gardner & Zimmerman, Joseph B. Gardner and Harris Zimmerman, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Max R. Kraus, Chicago, Ill., and Francis A. Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
1
This is an action for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Titanium Metals Corp. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Filon Plastics Corp. v. H. Koch & SonsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985