Legal Opinion
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Dillon Crotty
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 10, 2017No. 16–1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HECHT, Justice.
The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board filed a complaint alleging that an Iowa lawyer violated several disciplinary rules while representing a personal representative in an estate and in handling an appeal of a worker’s compensation case. After a hearing, the Grievance Commission of the Iowa Supreme Court found the lawyer violated several rules and recommended his license to practice be suspended for ninety days. Upon our de novo review, we find the lawyer violated various rules, and we conclude his license should be suspended with no possibility of reinstatement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey K. McGinnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lawrence L. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Melissa NineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lonnie B. SaundersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.