Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schreffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2002No. 104 MAP 2000Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

I agree with the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court that one seeking to file a claim petition for personal injury outside the three-year period of repose generally bears the burden of proving that the claim fits a statutory exception such as Section 315’s “in lieu of compensation” tolling clause. See 77 P.S. § 6Q2.1 Further, I join the lead opinion in holding that this tolling provision may be triggered by the voluntary payment of medical expenses and, correspondingly,’ in overruling Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co., 265 Pa. 291, 108 A.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Toborkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. NUS Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Golley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API