Sanford & Brooks Co. v. Columbia Dredging Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Suit in admiralty by the Columbia Dredging Company against the Sanford & Brooks Company. Decree for libelant (1G3 Fed. 3G2), and. respondent appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
BRAWLEY, District Judge.
This is a libel to recover $2,426.99, the balance alleged to be due for the hire of a tug and three mud scows, and also to recover the further sum of $1,822.58, alleged to have been expended by the libelant in repairing the scows upon their redelivery at the termination of the work, in order to put them in the condition in which they were when delivered to respondents. This last-mentioned claim was not allowed by the court below, and, as there is no appeal by the libelant, it will not be considered.
The respondents filed a cross-libel, claiming $3,112.31- for work done…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Northern BelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Frank Waterhouse, Ltd. v. Rock Island Alaska Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1892
3Cited by18 opinions
- THOMAS JORDAN, Inc. v. MAYRONNE DRILLING MUD, CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING SERVICECourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Dempsey v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- The TransitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Northern Fishing & Trading Co. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Patton-Tully Transp. Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.