Legal Opinion
Shannon Co. v. Wurlitzer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1932No. 4046, 4047, 4056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
The first question for consideration is whether or not Wurlitzer occupied the position with reference to the property and the construction of the houses as to make his interest in the property subject to the liens by virtue of §8310, GC.
Wurlitzer’s claim is that he made a conditional sales option with Blickensderfer’s concern, under which he was endeavoring to sell the real estate; that in the construction of the houses, he was noli the owner, part owner, nor had he any contractual relation for the construction of the houses with Blickensderfer or his company; that Blickensderfer’s company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Guiou v. RyckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Miller v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Arnstein Realty Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buckeye State Hauling, Inc. v. Troy, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1974
- Michael J. Baumann & Co. v. Qualstan Corp. (In Re Qualstan Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- In Re Estate of SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1955