Legal Opinion

Blood v. Hudspeth

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1940No. 2081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

James R. Blood, hereinafter called petitioner, brings for review an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from the custody of the warden of the penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. In October, 1934, two indictments were returned against petitioner and a co-defendant in the United States Court for Northern Oklahoma. The first, drawn under section 218 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 347, contained four counts. The first count charged the forging and counterfeiting of the signature of the postmaster at Catoosa, Oklahoma, to a post…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Christianson v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Buckner v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Zahn v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Murdock v. PollockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RedfieldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
  2. Blood v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Taylor v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Bissell v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API