Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Pollock

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1915No. 167PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Original petition by Theodore Murdook for a writ of mandamus, directed to John C. Pollock, Judge of the District Court of the United States 'for the District of Kansas. On hearing upon rule to show cause why a writ of ‘mandamus should not issue as prayed. Rule discharged, and petition dismissed.

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a prisoner in the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kan., under a sentence pronounced in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, fded in the District Court of the United States for the District of Kan-, sas an application for a writ of habeas corpus. He complains that the respondent, as judge of that court, has refused and neglected to take cognizance of this application, and accordingly prays that a writ of mandamus issue out of this court for his relief.

It appears from the petition filed herein, as well as from the return of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Erickson v. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. In re JordanDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1892
  5. In re LewisUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1902

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Christianson v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Zahn v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. John C. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. Banks v. O'GradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API