Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1909No. 144PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole Countyj A. T. West, Judge. Action by J. P. Ford against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. citing: Gil'let v. Burlington Tns. Co., 53 Kan. 108; Lee v. Railway Co., 67 Kan. 402; Railway Co. v, McCoy ei al.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Seminole Countyj A. T. West, Judge. Action by J. P. Ford against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. citing: Gil'let v. Burlington Tns. Co., 53 Kan. 108; Lee v. Railway Co., 67 Kan. 402; Railway Co. v, McCoy ei al. (Ind T.) 104 S. W. 620; Railway 'Co. v. Webb, 6 Ind T. 280; Railway Co. v. Bolson (Kan.) 14 Pac. a; Friclc v. Reynolds, 6 Oída. 638. citing: Railway Co. v. Shepherd, 20 Oída. 626; Railway Co. v. Ellis, 54 Fed. 481; Railroad Co. v. Stout (U. S.) 21 L. Ed. 745; Jones v. Railway Co., 128 U. S.…

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On May 10, 1906, J. P. Ford, defendant in error, plaintiff below, sued the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, in the mayor’s court within and for the incorporated town of IConawa in the western district of the Indian Territory. His complaint substantially states: That he is a resident of said town; that defendant owns and operates a line of railway through the same, and on February 5, 1906, maintained a depot and an agent there; that on said day, within the limits of said town, defendant, through its agents and servants, “without exercising…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. FarringtonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. KeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API