Legal Opinion

Harmatz v. Harmatz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1983No. 82-50PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Associate Judge:

Miriam Frances Harmatz appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion for modification and continuation of child support payments for the parties’ child who had reached the age of 21, and recommending that a conservator be appointed. Finding no error, we affirm. 1

I

The facts are not in dispute. Pursuant to a separation agreement incorporated into a divorce decree on October 22, 1968, Mr. Harmatz paid $200 per month toward the support of his “minor child” Gary. Gary reached 21 on May 27,1981. Gary has been brain-damaged since birth, is under constant medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Simonds v. SimondsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Koonin Ex Rel. Hornsby v. HornsbyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Foretich v. GlamourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API