Legal Opinion

Loring v. United States of America

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 17, 2020No. 4:18-cv-04034Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION □□□ □□□ KKK KKK KR KKK KK KKK KR RK KOK KK KK KKK RK RK ROKK RK DANIEL LORING, CIV 18-4034 Plaintiff, * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Vs. : AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . Defendant. * ERM HMMA HEHEHE RHHHRERHHHEN ER □□□ Plaintiff Daniel Loring (“Loring’’) brought this pro se lawsuit against the United States of America alleging legal malpractice by two Assistant United States Attorneys (““AUSAs”) who handled a civil lawsuit filed under the Fair Housing Act on Loring’s behalf. Pending before the Court are several motions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Burgs v. SisselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API