Pennwalt Corp. v. Center Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board1 (hereinafter TTAB) dismissing appellant’s opposition to appellee’s application to register the mark ALLERSET for an “allergenic extract prescription set used for injection for hyposensitization therapy in the field of allergy.” Appellant asserts that appellee’s mark so resembles appellant’s mark ALLEREST for “medication for relief of sinus passage congestion, allergies and hay fever” as to be likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception. We reverse.
No dispute arises over appellant being the first user.
Th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- General Shoe Corporation v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- C. L. Clifton, Sr., D. B. A. R & M Laboratories of Georgia v. Plough, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Octocom Systems, Inc. v. Houston Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990