Legal Opinion
Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. v. International Game Technology and IGT
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 13, 2007No. C06-3717 MJJPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY ON GROUNDS THAT THE ‘215 APPLICATION WAS ABANDONED UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 371 AND § 133.
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendants International Game Technology and IGT’s (collec tively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity on Grounds that the ‘215 Patent Was Abandoned Under 35 U.S.C. § 371 and § 133. 1 Plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited (“ATA”) and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (“ATI”) (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Aristocrat”) oppose the motion. For…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology & IGTCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis South Atlantic LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Glycobiosciences, Inc. v. Innocutis Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015