Legal Opinion

Barrett v. MacDonald

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1963No. 38,250Published

1Opinion of the Court

264 Minn. 560 (1963)

121 N.W. (2d) 165

SUSAN P. BARRETT

v.

ALICE P. MACDONALD AND OTHERS.

No. 38,250.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 21, 1963.

John D. Jenswold, Reavill, Jenswold, Neimeyer & Johnson, Samuel S. Gill, and Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, for appellant.

Edwin A. Martini and Martini, Perkins, Harper & Gustafson, for respondent Macdonald.

Herbert M. Burns and Wheeler, Burns & Buchanan, for respondent administrator c.t.a.

John G. Cedergren, for respondent executor.

UPON REARGUMENT

OTIS, JUSTICE.

Appellant, Susan P. Barrett, seeks review of a judgment allowing an amendment to a final…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. In Re Estate of DanielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Savela v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. In Re Estate of SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API