Legal Opinion
Aubert v. Dzurenda
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 4, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01329Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 THAD AUBERT, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-01329-GMN-EJY 5 vs. ) ) 6 JAMES DZURENDA, et al., ) ORDER 7 ) Defendants. ) 8 ) ) 9 ) 10 11 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Thad Aubert’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Motion for 12 Preliminary Injunction, (ECF No. 107), and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, (ECF 13 No. 108). Defendants James Dzurenda, James Cox, Warden Brian Williams, and Dwight 14 Neven (collectively, “Defendants”) filed Responses, (ECF Nos. 109–110). Plaintiff did not file 15 a reply. For the reasons discussed below, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- International Molders' and Allied Workers' Local Union No. 164 v. Alan Nelson, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.