Legal Opinion

Pacific Exploitation Co. v. Strickland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1920No. 15593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bonald, J., entered April 19, 19191, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

This was a replevin suit. The facts as found by the trial court are substantially as follows: *647One Harry W. Treat and wife, in 1914, were the owners of a certain lot in the city of Seattle, upon which was located a dwelling; that, while they were such owners, they entered into a written contract with the defendant Strickland for the sale to the latter of the house and lot for a designated sum of money; that, while such contract of sale was in force, Strickland installed on the premises a heating plant, consisting of a boiler, which was bricked in; that, as a part of the heating plant, various…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Filley v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wills v. ArmondWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API