Legal Opinion
Charles E. Falk and Max G. Wendell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1967No. 20032PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge:
Appellants were defendants below. After a court trial, defendant Falk was convicted of one count of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice, and defendant Wendell was convicted of one count of perjury. Both appealed, contending that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction. The charges arose out of defendants’ conduct in the trial of a bank robbery charge against Falk in which he had been acquitted by verdict of the jury.
Under Count VI of the Indictment, Wendell was convicted of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621. 1 The substance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Catrino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Jerome Byrnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. William J. CintoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Friedland, David, in No. 80-2052 United States of America v. Friedland, Jacob, in No. 80-2053Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Larry Wayne Brown, United States of America v. Larry Edward HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.