Legal Opinion

Cuba Railroad Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 18, 1947No. Docket No. 9397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Murdock, Judge:

The principles applicable in a case like this are sufficiently set forth in the following quotation from San Francisco Stevedoring Co., 8 T. C. 222:

*. * * A taxpayer, using an accrual method of accounting, must accrue an item in the year in which the taxpayer acquires a fixed and unconditional right to receive the amount, even.though actual payment is to be deferred. There must he no contingency or unreasonable uncertainty qualifying the payment or receipt. Income does not accrue to a taxpayer using an accrual method until there arises in him a fixed or unconditional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Estate of Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sartin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Flamingo Resort, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980
  3. Koehring Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Webbe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  5. Koehring Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API