Koehring Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastín G. White with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57 *716(a) [since September 1, 1969, Rule 134 (h)]. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on December 5, 1968. Exceptions to the commissioner’s findings and recommended conclusion of law were filed by plaintiff. Defendant requested that the court adopt the commissioner’s findings and recommended conclusion of law. The case has been submitted to the court on the briefs of the parties and…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Putoma Corp., Successor by Merger of Pro-Mac Company, Petitioners- Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Exchange Security Bank v. United States of America, Ellen Gregg Ingalls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In Re the Receivership Estate of Indian Motorcycle Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- European American Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.