Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Biddeford

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 11, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

This is an appeal from decree of a justice of the Superior Court, affirming decision of the Industrial Accident Commission, awarding compensation to petitioner.

The findings of facts, amply supported by the record, are in their essentials narratively stated as follows:

On February 23, 1940, Henry Martin was employed as a part-time laborer in the street department of the City of Bidde-ford. The city is divided, for street maintenance purposes, into districts, each supervised by a commissioner.

On the forenoon of that day, Martin was working in a crew engaged in sanding streets in District Number…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Ford v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Konopka v. Jackson County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Scott's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  5. City of Bangor v. RidleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Wyandotte Ind. CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Allison v. Brown & Horsch Insulation Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  3. Hammer v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API