Legal Opinion

Nall v. Tisdale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 3, 1991No. 89-1608, 89-1609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAGALL, Justice.

Plaintiffs Earline Nall and LaWanda Nall appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of defendants Larry Tisdale and Murray Envelope Corporation in the Nalls’ suit alleging negligence and wantonness in regard to an automobile collision on Interstate Highway 65. The Nalls argue on appeal that the trial judge erred in denying their motion for a new trial and in charging the jury on the “sudden emergency doctrine.”

On January 8, 1988, the Nalls and Tis-dale were headed south on Interstate 65 amid severe ice and snow. LaWanda Nall was driving a 1986 Toyota…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. McKinney v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Bennett v. WinquestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bettis v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API