Legal Opinion
United States v. James R. Brown and Carol Herklotz
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 1982No. 81-1757, 81-1758PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Carol Herklotz and James R. Brown were charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 665 by conspiring to embezzle and misapply property belonging to an employment training program funded under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA), 29 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. The eight count indictment also charged each defendant with one count of embezzlement and misapplication of government property and three counts of causing a false material statement to be made in a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1001.
*1115The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Russell Reed, James S. Doyle, and Thomas Francis RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Andrew West, Vertis King, and Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. George William Brady, and Leroy MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. William Henry Forrest and Maxine ForrestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mohammed Farhad KhorramiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Samuel M. ChaimsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Kevin L. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Benjamin Barry Kramer, Randy Thomas Lanier, Eugene Albert Fischer, and Kay Dee Bell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.