Pullman Wheat Growers, Inc. v. Attebury Elevators, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
Following a jury trial and entry of judgment vesting title to real and personal properties in, and decreeing recovery of *950property retention damages and a debt deficiency by, plaintiff Attebury Elevators, Inc., the defendants Pullman Wheat Growers, Inc., and Clinton L. Peat challenge the decretory portions of the judgment pertaining to certain personal properties and to the debt deficiency. Affirmed.
A perspective consideration of the fourteen points of error necessitates a recitation of the intricate facts leading to this litigation. On April 1, 1969, Clinton L. Peat…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McFarling v. LaphamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Burgess v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Kagan v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957