Legal Opinion

Pullman Wheat Growers, Inc. v. Attebury Elevators, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1973No. 8388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

Following a jury trial and entry of judgment vesting title to real and personal properties in, and decreeing recovery of *950property retention damages and a debt deficiency by, plaintiff Attebury Elevators, Inc., the defendants Pullman Wheat Growers, Inc., and Clinton L. Peat challenge the decretory portions of the judgment pertaining to certain personal properties and to the debt deficiency. Affirmed.

A perspective consideration of the fourteen points of error necessitates a recitation of the intricate facts leading to this litigation. On April 1, 1969, Clinton L. Peat…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFarling v. LaphamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Burgess v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Kagan v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medley v. Medley, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API