Legal Opinion
Wiegand v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 7, 2001No. 143, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
The issue this case presents is whether a bail bondsman, who posts a bail bond for a defendant whose pretrial release conditions prohibit the defendant from leaving the jurisdiction without court approval and who is not given prior notification of the court’s intention to amend the terms of the defendant’s pretrial release, is entitled to be discharged from the obligation of the bail bond when the court actually does amend the conditions of pretrial release. The Circuit Court for Harford County determined that, under the facts of this case, he was not. We shall affirm that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- United States v. John Wesley Egan and Bryan John Hill, and Stuyvesant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Rodriquez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CoronelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Professional Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 100 Washington, D.C. Area Pension Fund v. Western Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- State v. TWO JINN, INC.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- Big Louie Bail Bonds, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.