Murray v. Pannaci
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
Hattie G. Murray, the plaintiff, and Veronica Pannaci, one of the defendants, respectively owned a lot *530of ground — the two lots being contiguous to each other — at Sea-bright, N. J., each lot having a frontage on the Atlantic Ocean. The title to each lot extended only to high-water mark originally, but afterwards Mrs. Pannaci acquired title to land in front of her lot from the State Riparian Commissioners. The plaintiff acquired no such riparian addition. In the early part of October, 1901, by procurement of Veronica Pannaci or her husband, Hurley, the third defendant,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Leeds v. . Metropolitan Gas-Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Watts v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hinman v. Pacific Air TransportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Major v. Hefley-Coleman Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914