Legal Opinion
In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum United States of America v. Dwight L. Bailey, M.D. Family Health Care Associates of Southwest Virginia, Pc
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2000No. 99-4870PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge BEEZER joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
In connection with an investigation into federal healthcare offenses, the United States Attorney for the Western District of Virginia issued and served four subpoenas duces tecum on April 29, 1999, under the authority of 18 U.S.C. § 3486, which authorizes the Attorney General or her designee to subpoena records that may be relevant to an investigation into federal healthcare offenses. The doctor and the professional healthcare corporation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- American Civil Liberties Union v. ClapperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.