Hutton & Little v. Clark
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Cass Circuit Court. — Eon. Nick M. Bradley, .Judge
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
This action was instituted to recover commission for the sale of real estate. The judgment in the trial court was for the defendant.
The abstract of the record proper does not show that a motion for new trial was filed, or that judgment was rendered, or that an appeal was granted, or that a bill of exceptions was filed. The bill of exceptions shows these things, but it has been ruled time and again, by the Supreme and Appellate Courts, that record entries which are not matters of exception must appear in the record proper. [Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625; Pennowfsky v. Coerver, 205 Mo. 135;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harding v. BedollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Stark v. ZehnderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Pennowfsky v. CoerverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Huff v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- City of Macon ex rel. Quincy National Bank v. JaegerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hodson v. McAnerneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912