Legal Opinion

Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 6, 1990No. 23612-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

— Michael Sidis appeals from summary judgment orders dismissing his claims against Brodie/Dohr-mann, Inc. (Brodie/Dohrmann), a Washington corporation, Spring, Ltd. (Spring), a Swiss corporation, and Cambridge Corporation, Inc. (Cambridge), an Illinois corporation. Sidis contends that the trial court erred in determining that the statute of limitations had expired on his claims against Spring and Cambridge; Sidis further contends that material factual issues exist regarding Brodie/Dohrmann's alleged negligence.

Appellant Sidis brought this action alleging that he was injured on April 19, 1984,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Margetan v. Superior Chair Craft Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Wakeman v. LommersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API