Ross v. Lott
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Harris
Affirming.
“We, the jury, find the paper dated August 25, 1942, purporting to be the codicil to the will of J. Martin Ross, is the codicil to his will. ’ ’
On this appeal the appellants — whose evidence was directed solely at their one ground of contest, that of undue influence — argue with much vigor and no little fervor that that verdict is so flagrantly against the evidence, and so indicative of passion or prejudice, that it should be set aside. In support of their position, they summarize the evidence and rely upon the authority of Alcorn v. Alcorn, 279…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davidson v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Helm's Guardian v. NeatheryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kiefer's Ex'r and Ex'x v. DeibelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Gregg v. Hedges' GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Douglas' Exr. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Palmer v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949