Legal Opinion
Halstead v. Halstead
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1946No. Civ. 12924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTERIDGE, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application to vacate, i. e., discharge, two attachments which had been levied pursuant to the requirements of two antecedently issued writs commanding such action. All proceedings taken in relation to the issuance of the writs and the levies made pursuant thereto were regular and legal.
In May, 1942, plaintiff Margaret Halstead brought an action against her former husband, Earl T. Halstead, for his alleged breach of his written agreement to pay to her monthly a minimum sum of $50. The agreement further provided for an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gross v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Shaffer v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loeb & Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ross v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Syzemore v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & BonesteelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- National General Corp. v. Dutch Inns of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.