Legal Opinion
Lang v. Sullivan
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 23, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-4567(SSB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”), that plaintiff received overpayment of retirement insurance benefits under the Act and denying plaintiffs request for waiver of recovery of overpayment. For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the Secretary is affirmed.
I. Procedural History
Plaintiff was awarded retirement benefits at the age of 62 beginning in March of 1981. On April 19, 1988, the Social…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ermano Valente v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Anthony Gober v. David Matthews, as Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karlson v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Lang (Arthur Henry) v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Stevens v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017