Legal Opinion

Neal v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1990No. 87-1087Published

1Opinion of the Court

571 A.2d 222 (1990)

Anthony NEAL, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 87-1087.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued July 11, 1989.

Decided March 12, 1990.

Thomas G. Ross for appellant.

Rachel Adelman-Pierson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Arlington, Va., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee.

James Klein, Washington, D.C., and Elizabeth G. Taylor filed an amicus curiae brief for the Public Defender Service, on behalf of appellant.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.

NEWMAN,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Cooper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Dent v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API