Legal Opinion

United States v. Knox

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1997No. 95-5274PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

In this direct criminal appeal, we consider the admissibility of alleged hearsay evidence. We hold that the evidence in dispute was properly admissible as non-hearsay pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(A). See Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 521 F.2d 465, 472-73 (10th Cir.1975) (“An appellate court will affirm the rulings of the lower court on any ground that finds support in the record, even where the lower court reached its conclusions from a different or even erroneous course of reasoning.”); see also United States v. Ross, 321 F.2d 61, 69 (2d Cir.1963) (“[W]e should…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Cisneros-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. John G. Gowan v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API