Legal Opinion

Federated Rural Electric Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2008No. 07-35596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*540MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff-Appellant TIG Insurance Company (“TIG”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Public Utility District No.l of Cowlitz County, Washington (“PUD”). The sole question on appeal is whether the district court erred in determining that the TIG following-form excess policy failed to sufficiently specify that its exclusion for “any ... earth movement” was meant to exclude coverage for “sinkhole collapse” in light of a provision extending coverage for such a peril in PUD’s primary insurance policy with Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Agrigenetics, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
  2. Saipan Air, Inc. v. StukesDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API