Legal Opinion

State v. Sutherland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1999No. ED 74659PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL J. SIMON, Judge.

Steven Sutherland, appellant, appeals his conviction under Section 195.211 RSMo. 1994 (all further references shall be to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted) for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying: (1) his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction in that the evidence failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant had “knowing and conscious” possession of the marijuana; (2) his motion in limine and overruling his objections to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. WorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. State v. SledgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. SimmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. WeichtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Evans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Wilkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API