National Labor Relations Board v. American White Cross Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The Board found as a fact that the company discharged the employee because of the A. F. of L. Union’s request, and that, to the company’s knowledge at the time, that request was based in substantial part on the fact that she had testified at the Board’s hearing on January 15, 1944. Substantial evidence supports this finding. On the basis of the facts found, we think the Board did not err in concluding that the discharge violated § 8(4). The closed-shop proviso of § 8(3) and the closed-shop contract cannot be read as requiring or authorizing an employer to act in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Local No. 2880, Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by15 opinions
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
- Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, American Federation of Musicians, Afl, and Al Manuti, Its AgentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Colonie Fibre Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Rivera v. Junta de Relaciones del TrabajoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.