Legal Opinion

National Telephone Directory Co. v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George H. Williams, Judge. Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of section 7412 and' 7413 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1909, by filing before tbe justice tbe instrument sued on. Herrick v. Maness, 142 Mo. App., 399; Calmes v. Haigbt & Co., 85 Mo. App., 362; Rhea v. Mfg. Co., 81 Mo. App., 400; Haynes v. R. R., 54 Mo. App., 582; Boefer v. Sheridan, 42 Mo. App., 226.

1Opinion of the CourtCaulfield, J.

Suit originating before a justice of tbe peace for breach of contract. The plaintiff bad judgment, and tbe defendant has appealed. No bill of exceptions was filed and tbe only question before us arises upon tbe record proper. Plaintiff did not file any statement or pleading as such before tbe justice, but commenced its suit before tbe justice by filing an instrument of writing, executed by tbe defendant, as follows:

‘‘$275.00 St. Louis, Aug. 3rd, 1907.

National Telephone Directory Co.

Frisco Building.

You are hereby authorized to insert one page advertisement for which we will furnish copy, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. BurrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Collins v. KammannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Rechnitzer v. St. Louis Candy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arkansas Tax Commission v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API