Collins v. Kammann
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Eishee, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him as garnishee of the Progressive Benefit Order. The facts, succinctly stated, are as follows: The Progressive Benefit Order is a foreign corporation, and one of its objects and charter powers is to establish a benefit and reserve fund *465from which those, who have held a certificate of membership in it for one year, may receive an amount of $100. By the general laws of the order, this $100 is payable to all who pay assessments at the rate of $2, when called for. Subordinate lodges are established, and it is provided that, whenever an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lackland v. GarescheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Sheedy v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Bensley v. HaeberleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- Birtwhistle v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Ritter v. Boston Underwriters InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sutton v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Trimble v. ElkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Rowe v. SchertzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Swezea v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- National Telephone Directory Co. v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911