Legal Opinion
First Union National Bank v. Woermer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 27, 2005No. AC 25830PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendants William S. Woermer and Charlotte P. Woermer1 appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered in favor of the substitute *698plaintiff, EMC Mortgage Corporation.2 The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) continued to exercise jurisdiction over the action after it failed to render judgment within 120 days of the filing of posttrial briefs and (2) admitted into evidence two of the plaintiffs exhibits that were submitted to establish the principal amount of the debt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court’s memorandum of decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Crest Plumbing & Heating Co. v. DiLoretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. CarabettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LM Ins. Corp. v. Connecticut Dismanteling, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Valley National Bank v. MarcanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- First Union National Bank v. WoermerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Midland Funding, LLC v. Mitchell-JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016