Haussecker v. Childs
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
In this appeal from summary judgment in a legal malpractice case, Joseph and Gail Haussecker allege a fact question as to whether the Hausseckers’ underlying silicosis claims were barred by statute of limitations before the Hausseckers sought advice from attorney Jerry Childs. Finding a fact question exists as to whether the discovery exception to limitations applied, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Joseph Haussecker was hired by AMF Tuboscope, Inc. in 1961. He worked there as a sandblaster until 1963 when he was transferred to Tuboseope’s pipe pickling 1 operation after he…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Eiland v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Eiland v. Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- L. W. v. L. S., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.