Legal Opinion
Uretek (USA), Incorporated v. Continental Casualty
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2017No. 15-20104UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
In this insurance coverage dispute, Ure-tek (USA), Inc. (Uretek) sought a defense from Continental Casualty Co. (Continental), its commercial general liability insurer, in connection with a counterclaim filed by a rival. Continental declined to defend the suit and Uretek sued, seeking a declaratory judgment, damages for breach of contract, and punitive damages. The district court entered summary judgment for Continental, concluding that none of allegations in the counterclaim came within the policy’s “personal and advertising injury” coverage. For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Papa John's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Granite State Insurance Co. v. Primary Arms, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Granite State Insurance Company v. Primary Arms, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024