Legal Opinion

Browne v. Sweet

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1899No. Sac. No. 601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County. J. W. Harrington, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This appeal is from the judgment which was entered upon overruling defendants’ demurrer to the amended complaint, the defendants declining to answer.

The action was to foreclose a mortgage given by one J. B. Sweet to secure his promissory note for the sum of five hundred dollars. In addition to the usual allegations in regard to the mortgage, it is averred in the complaint that J. B. Sweet died intestate on the 4th of October, A. D. 1895, leaving as his only heirs at law his wife, IJrena Sweet, and two minor children, to wit, Celia Sweet and Alfred Kenneth Sweet, who are the defendants herein.

I…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Brocker, Adm'r v. StallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API