Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 2000No. Civ.A. 97CV3767PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HART, United States Magistrate Judge.
On January 25, 2000, after a five day trial, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in this age discrimination suit. The jury awarded $106,736 in backpay, $130,596 in front pay, and $175,000 in compensatory damages provided for by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, (“PHRA”). In addition, the jury found the defendant’s violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, “ADEA,” willful. Therefore, the court doubled the award for backpay, resulting in a total award of $519,068. The Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Mold the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sun Ship, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Matson Navigation Co., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Leatch Booker, Iii v. Taylor Milk Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Joseph Squires, Sr. v. Thomas Bonser Jay E. Huffman Middle Smithfield TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Eshelman v. Agere Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Blaney v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratoryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.