Legal Opinion

Aetna Life & Casualty, Casualty & Surety Division v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1981No. 52078PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

Plaintiff Aetna Life & Casualty appeals and defendant Edward Anderson cross-appeals from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action to enforce its subrogation rights against defendant. We reverse and remand with instructions.

In September 1975, Thomas Anderson (hereinafter employee) was involved in a motor vehicle accident with defendant while within the course of his employment with Diebold, Inc. Plaintiff, insurer for Diebold, accepted workers’ compensation liability for the injuries sustained by employee and began payment of benefits to him. An…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lang v. William Bros Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Stephenson v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Albert v. Edgewater Beach Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Paine v. Water Works Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Haase v. HaaseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Teva Pharm. Indus., Ltd. v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API