Stromblad v. Hanover Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Motion by respective parties for direction of verdict and to set aside special verdict of the jury.
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
George A. Stromblad bought a Marmon coupe in May, 1921, upon a conditional sale contract. The First Mortgage Bond Corporation of America, the other plaintiff, financed the purchase, and took an assignment of the contract. On May 9, 1921, the defendant issued a policy insuring both plaintiffs, “ as their respective interests may appear,” against direct loss or damage from fire, theft, robbery and pilferage, in the sum of $5,582, the purchase price of the car. While said policy was in force, and on the 6th day of October, 1921, the car was destroyed by fire. This action is brought by both of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Ætna Fire Insurance v. TylerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Dilleber v. . Home Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gray v. . BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Forward v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. Morris Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Spadaro v. Chenango County National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Besler v. Eldorado Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Picone v. PiconeNew York Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.