Legal Opinion

Gibson v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 19, 2011No. 10 C 1417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHARLES R. NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Movant Joseph Gibson’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

A. Facts

To end his feud with a rival drug dealer, Joseph Gibson (“Gibson”) in early 2006 enlisted Walter Hampton (“Hampton”) to kill the rival dealer. In exchange, Gibson would give Hampton profits from his drug sales. Gibson would also provide a “clean” gun for the murder. (A “clean” gun has no serial number.) Hampton had misgivings and revealed…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API