Legal Opinion

Horner v. Barber

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1964No. Civ. 27751PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiff and defendants occupied separate parts of the same building, defendants conducting a garage business in their portion. A fire started in the portion occupied by defendants, causing a fire loss to plaintiffs. The action has been tried twice. Defendants prevailed at the first trial, but a new trial was granted and at the second trial a jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Judgment was entered thereon, defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied, and defendants appeal.

In support of their appeal, defendants urge insufficiency of the evidence to establish negligence, improper and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Fowler v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Strong v. ShawNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Megee v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Gicking v. KimberlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Gicking v. KimberlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API