Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. First Installation & Service Repair Today
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 27, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00015Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON YSIDRO ESPINOZA, JR., Case No. 3:21-cv-00015-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. FIRST INSTALLATION SERVICE AND REPAIR, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Before the Court are Ysidro Espinoza, Jr.’s (“Espinoza”) application to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. The Court’s examination of Espinoza’s application to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that Espinoza is unable to afford the filing fee. The Court therefore grants Espinoza’s application. For the reasons explained below,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Nkrumah v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014