New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Gloucester Environmental Management Services, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court is the motion of the individual operator defendants, Anthony Amadei, Richard Winn and David Ehrlich, for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims asserted against them pursuant to the Sanitary Landfill Facility Closure and Contingency Fund Act N.J.S.A. 13:1E-100 et seq. The individual operator defendants argue that summary judgment is appropriate because they cannot be held liable as “owners or operators” 1 of the GEMS Landfill as defined by the Sanitary Landfill Facility Closure and Contingency Fund Act since each of them owned…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Time Warner Entertainment/Advance-Newhouse Partnership v. Worldwide Electronics, L.C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. MITNICK LAW OFFICE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- BELL CONTAINER CORP. v. PALAGONIA BAKERY CO. INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUNDING, LLC v. LANCASTER RESOURCES, INC .District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- New Jersey DEP v. GLOUCESTER ENV. MGT. SERVICESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.